Nippon telegraph and telephone corporation (20240241822). CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION APPARATUS, CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION METHOD AND PROGRAM simplified abstract
Contents
- 1 CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION APPARATUS, CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION METHOD AND PROGRAM
- 1.1 Organization Name
- 1.2 Inventor(s)
- 1.3 CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION APPARATUS, CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION METHOD AND PROGRAM - A simplified explanation of the abstract
- 1.4 Simplified Explanation
- 1.5 Key Features and Innovation
- 1.6 Potential Applications
- 1.7 Problems Solved
- 1.8 Benefits
- 1.9 Commercial Applications
- 1.10 Prior Art
- 1.11 Frequently Updated Research
- 1.12 Questions about Unimplemented Code Detection Device
- 1.13 Original Abstract Submitted
CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION APPARATUS, CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION METHOD AND PROGRAM
Organization Name
nippon telegraph and telephone corporation
Inventor(s)
Ziv Glazberg of Ramat Gan (IL)
Erez Keinan of Rishon Le-zion (IL)
CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION APPARATUS, CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION METHOD AND PROGRAM - A simplified explanation of the abstract
This abstract first appeared for US patent application 20240241822 titled 'CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION APPARATUS, CODE IMPLEMENTATION MISSING DETECTION METHOD AND PROGRAM
Simplified Explanation
The patent application describes a device that detects unimplemented code in a test target system by comparing the coverage of a test executed by the system with that of a reference model.
Key Features and Innovation
- Acquisition unit gathers execution results and coverage of tests from both the test target system and a reference model.
- Determination unit compares test coverage to identify unimplemented code in the test target system.
- Focuses on detecting incorrect execution results in the test target system.
Potential Applications
The technology can be applied in software development and quality assurance processes to identify unimplemented code and improve system performance.
Problems Solved
- Detects unimplemented code in test target systems.
- Helps in improving the accuracy and efficiency of testing processes.
- Enhances the overall quality of software systems.
Benefits
- Increases the reliability of test results.
- Facilitates the identification and resolution of unimplemented code.
- Improves the overall performance of software systems.
Commercial Applications
Title: Unimplemented Code Detection Device This technology can be utilized by software development companies, quality assurance teams, and IT departments to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of testing processes. It can also be integrated into automated testing tools to streamline software development workflows.
Prior Art
Readers interested in exploring prior art related to this technology can start by researching software testing methodologies, code coverage analysis tools, and quality assurance practices in software development.
Frequently Updated Research
Stay updated on the latest advancements in software testing methodologies, code coverage analysis techniques, and quality assurance tools to enhance the effectiveness of unimplemented code detection devices.
Questions about Unimplemented Code Detection Device
How does the device compare the coverage of tests between the test target system and the reference model?
The device uses the acquisition unit to gather execution results and coverage data from both systems, then the determination unit compares the coverage to identify any discrepancies.
What are the potential benefits of using this technology in software development processes?
Using this technology can lead to improved system performance, enhanced test accuracy, and more efficient identification of unimplemented code, ultimately resulting in higher quality software products.
Original Abstract Submitted
an unimplemented code detection device includes: an acquisition unit that acquires an execution result and a coverage of a test executed by a test target system on the basis of an input, and an execution result and a coverage of a test executed by a reference model on the basis of the input; and a determination unit that compares the coverage of the test by the test target system with the coverage of the test by the reference model, to determine whether there is an unimplemented code in the test target system, when the execution result of the test by the test target system is incorrect.
