Micron technology, inc. (20240160566). INDEPENDENT FLASH TRANSLATION LAYER TABLES FOR MEMORY simplified abstract

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

INDEPENDENT FLASH TRANSLATION LAYER TABLES FOR MEMORY

Organization Name

micron technology, inc.

Inventor(s)

Marco Redaelli of München (DE)

INDEPENDENT FLASH TRANSLATION LAYER TABLES FOR MEMORY - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 20240160566 titled 'INDEPENDENT FLASH TRANSLATION LAYER TABLES FOR MEMORY

Simplified Explanation

The abstract describes a memory sub-system with multiple flash translation layer (FTL) tables, allowing for improved reliability by using a secondary FTL table in case of corruption in the primary one.

  • The memory sub-system includes one or more memory components.
  • The FTL translates logical addresses used by the host to physical addresses for accessing physical memory.
  • If one FTL table is corrupted, another FTL table's logical-to-physical mapping can be used to maintain read-write access to at least a portion of the memory sub-system.

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in various storage devices such as solid-state drives (SSDs), memory cards, and embedded systems.

Problems Solved

1. Improved reliability in memory sub-systems by utilizing multiple FTL tables. 2. Ensuring continued read-write access to memory even if one FTL table is corrupted.

Benefits

1. Enhanced data reliability and integrity. 2. Increased fault tolerance in memory systems. 3. Improved overall performance and longevity of storage devices.

Potential Commercial Applications

Enhanced memory sub-systems with multiple FTL tables could be used in consumer electronics, data centers, automotive systems, and industrial applications.

Possible Prior Art

Previous solutions in memory systems may have focused on single FTL tables, lacking the redundancy and reliability provided by multiple FTL tables in this innovation.

Unanswered Questions

How does the system determine which FTL table to use in case of corruption?

The abstract does not specify the mechanism for selecting the secondary FTL table when the primary one is corrupted.

What is the impact on performance when switching between FTL tables?

It is not clear from the abstract how the system handles the transition between FTL tables and if there is any performance impact during this process.


Original Abstract Submitted

a memory sub-system with multiple flash translation layer (ftl) tables is disclosed. a host system can utilize a memory sub-system that includes one or more memory components. the host system can provide data to be stored at the memory sub-system and can request data to be retrieved from the memory sub-system. the ftl provides several services, including translating logical addresses used by the host to physical addresses used to access physical memory. if one ftl table is corrupted, the logical-to-physical mapping of another ftl table may be used, allowing the device to continue to provide read-write access to at least a portion of the memory sub-system. thus, by use of a secondary ftl table, the reliability of the memory sub-system is improved.