Apple inc. (20240187395). AUTHENTICATED INTERFACE ELEMENT INTERACTIONS simplified abstract

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

AUTHENTICATED INTERFACE ELEMENT INTERACTIONS

Organization Name

apple inc.

Inventor(s)

James R. Montgomerie of Sunnyvale CA (US)

Jessica Aranda of Cupertino CA (US)

Patrick Coffman of San Francisco CA (US)

Julien Freudiger of San Francisco CA (US)

Matthew H. Gamble of Mill Valley CA (US)

Ron Huang of San Jose CA (US)

Anant Jain of San Francisco CA (US)

Glen S. Low of Los Gatos CA (US)

Andrey Pokrovskiy of Mountain View CA (US)

Stephen J. Rhee of San Jose CA (US)

Matthew E. Shepherd of Mountain View CA (US)

Ansh Shukla of Cupertino CA (US)

Katherine Skinner of San Francisco CA (US)

Kyle M. Sluder of San Francisco CA (US)

Christopher Soli of San Francisco CA (US)

Christopher K. Thomas of Sunnyvale CA (US)

Guy L. Tribble of Woodside CA (US)

John Wilander of San Jose CA (US)

AUTHENTICATED INTERFACE ELEMENT INTERACTIONS - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 20240187395 titled 'AUTHENTICATED INTERFACE ELEMENT INTERACTIONS

Simplified Explanation

The abstract of the patent application describes an access control system designed to prevent unauthorized access to privacy-related functionality on an electronic device. The system validates software-based events by confirming their correspondence with hardware input events, thus preventing the spoofing of user interface inputs that could fraudulently grant access to specific functionality.

  • The access control system prevents the surreptitious granting of access to privacy-related functionality on an electronic device.
  • Software-based events are validated by confirming their correspondence with hardware input events.
  • The system prevents the spoofing of user interface inputs that could be used to fraudulently grant access to specific functionality.

Potential Applications

The technology can be applied in various industries such as healthcare, finance, and government agencies to protect sensitive information and prevent unauthorized access to critical systems.

Problems Solved

The technology addresses the issue of unauthorized access to privacy-related functionality on electronic devices, preventing potential data breaches and unauthorized use of sensitive information.

Benefits

The access control system provides an additional layer of security to electronic devices, ensuring that only authorized users can access privacy-related functionality. This helps protect sensitive information and prevent fraudulent activities.

Potential Commercial Applications

The technology can be integrated into smartphones, tablets, computers, and other electronic devices to enhance security and protect user privacy. It can be marketed to companies that handle sensitive data and require robust access control measures.

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art for this technology could be existing access control systems that use biometric authentication or two-factor authentication to verify user identity before granting access to specific functionalities on electronic devices.

Unanswered Questions

How does the access control system handle potential false positives or false negatives in event validation?

The patent application does not provide details on how the system addresses potential errors in event validation that could result in either granting access to unauthorized users or denying access to legitimate users.

What measures are in place to ensure the secure storage and handling of hardware input events for validation purposes?

The patent application does not mention any specific security measures or protocols for storing and handling hardware input events used in the validation process, raising concerns about the potential vulnerability of this data to unauthorized access or manipulation.


Original Abstract Submitted

an access control system is provided to prevent the surreptitious granting of access to privacy related functionality on an electronic device. software-based events to grant access to device functionality can be validated by confirming that the software event corresponds with a hardware input event. this validation prevents the spoofing of a user interface input that may be used to fraudulently grant access to specific functionality.