18501226. FLOW BODY FOR AN AIRCRAFT WITH SPLIT RIBS simplified abstract (Airbus Operations GmbH)
Contents
- 1 FLOW BODY FOR AN AIRCRAFT WITH SPLIT RIBS
- 1.1 Organization Name
- 1.2 Inventor(s)
- 1.3 FLOW BODY FOR AN AIRCRAFT WITH SPLIT RIBS - A simplified explanation of the abstract
- 1.4 Simplified Explanation
- 1.5 Potential Applications
- 1.6 Problems Solved
- 1.7 Benefits
- 1.8 Potential Commercial Applications
- 1.9 Possible Prior Art
- 1.10 Original Abstract Submitted
FLOW BODY FOR AN AIRCRAFT WITH SPLIT RIBS
Organization Name
Inventor(s)
Stefan Bensmann of HAMBURG (DE)
FLOW BODY FOR AN AIRCRAFT WITH SPLIT RIBS - A simplified explanation of the abstract
This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18501226 titled 'FLOW BODY FOR AN AIRCRAFT WITH SPLIT RIBS
Simplified Explanation
The patent application describes a flow body for an aircraft with a unique rib structure that includes two independent flanges attached to the front skin of the aircraft.
- The flow body for an aircraft includes a front skin with an outer surface for contact with ambient flow and an inner surface, at least one rib with two independent flanges attached to the front skin.
- The two flanges of the rib extend from a common junction section towards the first side, diverging towards the first side, and have attachment straps corresponding to the inner surface of the front skin.
Potential Applications
This technology could be applied in the aerospace industry for improving the aerodynamic performance of aircraft by enhancing the flow characteristics around the aircraft body.
Problems Solved
This innovation solves the problem of inefficient flow control around the aircraft body, leading to improved aerodynamic efficiency and reduced drag.
Benefits
The benefits of this technology include increased fuel efficiency, enhanced maneuverability, and improved overall performance of the aircraft.
Potential Commercial Applications
Potential commercial applications of this technology include use in commercial airliners, military aircraft, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to improve their aerodynamic performance and reduce fuel consumption.
Possible Prior Art
One possible prior art could be the use of traditional rib structures in aircraft flow bodies, which may not offer the same level of efficiency and performance as the unique rib structure described in the patent application.
Unanswered Questions
How does this technology compare to existing flow body designs in terms of aerodynamic performance and fuel efficiency?
This article does not provide a direct comparison with existing flow body designs in terms of aerodynamic performance and fuel efficiency. Further research and testing would be needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this technology in comparison to existing designs.
What are the potential challenges in implementing this technology in existing aircraft structures?
The article does not address the potential challenges in implementing this technology in existing aircraft structures. Factors such as retrofitting costs, compatibility with current systems, and certification requirements could pose challenges in the adoption of this innovation.
Original Abstract Submitted
A flow body for an aircraft includes a front skin having an outer surface configured to be contacted by an ambient flow, and an inner surface opposite the outer surface, at least one rib arranged inside the flow body and having a first side and a second side. The at least one rib comprises two independent flanges. The two flanges extend from a common junction section, which is arranged between the first side and the second side, to the first side. The two flanges diverge towards the first side. Each flange comprises an attachment strap at the first side for attaching the respective flange to the front skin. The respective attachment strap has a shape corresponding to the shape of the inner surface of the front skin.
