18464652. DUPLEX ELEVATOR simplified abstract (HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY)

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

DUPLEX ELEVATOR

Organization Name

HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY

Inventor(s)

Donguk Lee of Seoul (KR)

Sungsu Park of Seoul (KR)

DUPLEX ELEVATOR - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18464652 titled 'DUPLEX ELEVATOR

Simplified Explanation

The embodiment elevator described in the abstract features a cage with two chambers, one above the other, where the upper chamber is smaller in height than the lower chamber.

  • The elevator includes a cage with two chambers, one above the other, where the upper chamber is smaller in height than the lower chamber.
  • A raising/lowering driving device is used to move the cage in an up-down direction within the hoistway.
  • The first chamber has a greater height than the second chamber, with the second chamber coupled to either the upper or lower side of the first chamber.

Potential Applications

The technology could be applied in various industries such as construction, manufacturing, and transportation for efficient vertical movement of goods and people.

Problems Solved

This innovation solves the problem of optimizing vertical space within elevators, allowing for more efficient transportation of goods and people in buildings.

Benefits

The benefits of this technology include increased efficiency in vertical transportation, better space utilization within elevators, and improved overall building functionality.

Potential Commercial Applications

A potential commercial application of this technology could be in the construction of high-rise buildings, where efficient vertical transportation is crucial for the building's functionality and usability.

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art could be traditional elevators with single-chamber cages that do not optimize vertical space as efficiently as the two-chamber design described in this patent application.

Unanswered Questions

How does this technology compare to existing elevator designs in terms of energy efficiency?

The article does not provide information on the energy efficiency of this technology compared to traditional elevator designs.

Are there any limitations to the height difference between the two chambers in the cage?

The article does not address any potential limitations or constraints related to the height difference between the two chambers in the elevator cage.


Original Abstract Submitted

An embodiment elevator includes a cage located on a hoistway and a raising/lowering driving device configured to raise and lower the cage in an up-down direction. The cage includes a first chamber having a first space as an inner space and a second chamber having a second space as an inner space, the second chamber is coupled to an upper or lower side of the first chamber, and a height of the first chamber is greater than a height of the second chamber in the up-down direction.