18423228. SUB-BAND-FULL-DUPLEX INTERFERENCE MITIGATION simplified abstract (QUALCOMM Incorporated)
Contents
- 1 SUB-BAND-FULL-DUPLEX INTERFERENCE MITIGATION
- 1.1 Organization Name
- 1.2 Inventor(s)
- 1.3 SUB-BAND-FULL-DUPLEX INTERFERENCE MITIGATION - A simplified explanation of the abstract
- 1.4 Simplified Explanation
- 1.5 Potential Applications
- 1.6 Problems Solved
- 1.7 Benefits
- 1.8 Potential Commercial Applications
- 1.9 Possible Prior Art
- 1.10 Unanswered Questions
- 1.11 Original Abstract Submitted
SUB-BAND-FULL-DUPLEX INTERFERENCE MITIGATION
Organization Name
Inventor(s)
Joseph Patrick Burke of Carlsbad CA (US)
Muhammad Sayed Khairy Abdelghaffar of San Jose CA (US)
Charline Hao of San Diego CA (US)
Joseph Binamira Soriaga of San Diego CA (US)
Lai Kan Leung of Carlsbad CA (US)
Gurkanwal Singh Sahota of Rancho Santa Fe CA (US)
Tingfang Ji of San Diego CA (US)
Krishna Kiran Mukkavilli of San Diego CA (US)
Allen Minh-Triet Tran of Rancho Santa Fe CA (US)
SUB-BAND-FULL-DUPLEX INTERFERENCE MITIGATION - A simplified explanation of the abstract
This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18423228 titled 'SUB-BAND-FULL-DUPLEX INTERFERENCE MITIGATION
Simplified Explanation
The patent application describes a method for mitigating UE-to-UE interference during SBFD slots in a TDD system by filtering signals to block specific sub-bands.
- UL UE transmits in first sub-band during SBFD slot
- DL UE receives in second sub-band during SBFD slot
- DL UE filters DL signal to block second sub-band during SBFD slot
Potential Applications
This technology could be applied in TDD systems to improve spectral efficiency and reduce interference between user equipment.
Problems Solved
This technology solves the issue of UE-to-UE interference during SBFD slots in TDD systems, improving overall system performance.
Benefits
- Enhanced spectral efficiency - Improved signal quality - Reduced interference between UEs
Potential Commercial Applications
"Mitigation of UE-to-UE Interference in TDD Systems Using Sub-Band Filtering"
Possible Prior Art
There may be prior art related to TDD systems and interference mitigation techniques, but specific examples are not provided in the abstract.
Unanswered Questions
How does the filtering process impact overall system performance?
The filtering process may introduce additional complexity to the system. It is important to understand the trade-offs between interference mitigation and system efficiency.
Are there any limitations to the sub-band filtering approach?
It is essential to consider any potential drawbacks or limitations of using sub-band filtering to mitigate interference in TDD systems.
Original Abstract Submitted
During an uplink TDD slot, an UL UE transmits an UL signal that occupies a slot frequency range. Similarly, during a DL TDD slot, a DL UE receives a DL signal that occupies the slot frequency range. But during an SBFD slot, a UL UE transmits a UL signal that occupies only a first sub-band of the slot frequency range. Similarly, a DL UE receives a DL signal during an SBFD slot that occupies only a second sub-band of the slot frequency range. The second sub-band is distinct from the first sub-band. The DL UE may thus mitigate UE-to-UE interference during an SBFD slot by filtering the DL signal to substantially block the second sub-band from being received at the DL UE.
- QUALCOMM Incorporated
- Joseph Patrick Burke of Carlsbad CA (US)
- Muhammad Sayed Khairy Abdelghaffar of San Jose CA (US)
- Charline Hao of San Diego CA (US)
- Joseph Binamira Soriaga of San Diego CA (US)
- Lai Kan Leung of Carlsbad CA (US)
- Gurkanwal Singh Sahota of Rancho Santa Fe CA (US)
- Tingfang Ji of San Diego CA (US)
- Krishna Kiran Mukkavilli of San Diego CA (US)
- Allen Minh-Triet Tran of Rancho Santa Fe CA (US)
- H04W52/14
- H04B15/00
- H04B17/318
- H04L5/14