18063593. RELEVANT CONTENT DOCUMENT COMPARISON simplified abstract (HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.)
Contents
RELEVANT CONTENT DOCUMENT COMPARISON
Organization Name
Inventor(s)
Jason Halpern of Elkins Park PA (US)
Lakshminarayana Paila of Knoxville TN (US)
RELEVANT CONTENT DOCUMENT COMPARISON - A simplified explanation of the abstract
This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18063593 titled 'RELEVANT CONTENT DOCUMENT COMPARISON
The method described in the abstract involves comparing multiple sections of two documents, each tagged with metadata indicating a relationship with a department of an organization, to determine differences in department-relevant sections. These differences are then presented to a user in a document difference viewer.
- The method involves receiving and analyzing documents with department-related metadata.
- It compares the department-relevant sections of the documents to identify differences.
- The differences are presented to the user for review and analysis.
Potential Applications: This technology could be used in document management systems to streamline the review process for department-specific content.
Problems Solved: This technology helps identify discrepancies and inconsistencies in department-related information across documents.
Benefits: Users can easily compare and analyze department-relevant sections of documents for accuracy and consistency.
Commercial Applications: This technology could be valuable for organizations with multiple departments that need to ensure consistency in their documentation.
Prior Art: Researchers may want to explore existing technologies in document management and comparison tools for similar functionalities.
Frequently Updated Research: Stay informed about advancements in document comparison technologies and their applications in organizational settings.
Questions about Document Comparison Technology: 1. How does this technology improve document review processes? 2. What are the potential challenges in implementing this technology in large organizations?
Original Abstract Submitted
A method includes receiving a first document, the first document including multiple sections, each of the multiple sections tagged with metadata indicating a relationship with a department of an organization; receiving a second document, the second document including multiple sections, each of the multiple sections tagged with metadata indicating a relationship with the department of the organization; comparing the sections of the first document tagged with metadata indicating the relationship of the first document with the department with the sections of the second document tagged with metadata indicating the relationship of the second document with the department to determine differences between the department-relevant sections of the first document and the department-relevant sections of the second document; and presenting the differences between the department-relevant sections to a user in a document difference viewer.
