17846866. NEURAL NETWORK-BASED LANGUAGE RESTRICTION simplified abstract (NVIDIA Corporation)

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NEURAL NETWORK-BASED LANGUAGE RESTRICTION

Organization Name

NVIDIA Corporation

Inventor(s)

Wei Ping of Sunnyvale CA (US)

Boxin Wang of Urbana IL (US)

Chaowei Xiao of Seattle WA (US)

Mohammad Shoeybi of Foster City CA (US)

Mostofa Patwary of Fremont CA (US)

Anima Anandkumar of Pasadena CA (US)

Bryan Catanzaro of Los Altos Hills CA (US)

NEURAL NETWORK-BASED LANGUAGE RESTRICTION - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 17846866 titled 'NEURAL NETWORK-BASED LANGUAGE RESTRICTION

Simplified Explanation

The patent application abstract describes the use of neural networks to identify and prevent the generation of restricted content.

  • Neural networks are utilized to identify restricted content based solely on the content itself.
  • The technology aims to prevent the creation of restricted content before it is generated.

Potential Applications

The technology could be applied in various industries such as social media platforms, online content moderation, and digital publishing to prevent the dissemination of restricted content.

Problems Solved

This technology addresses the issue of identifying and preventing the creation of restricted content, which can help in maintaining a safe and compliant online environment.

Benefits

The use of neural networks for content identification can improve the efficiency and accuracy of detecting restricted content, leading to better content moderation practices.

Potential Commercial Applications

The technology could be valuable for companies that rely on user-generated content, as it can help in maintaining a safe and compliant online platform. A potential SEO-optimized title for this section could be "Commercial Applications of Neural Network Content Identification Technology."

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art could be existing content moderation tools that use keyword filtering or manual review processes to identify restricted content.

Unanswered Questions

How does this technology handle false positives in identifying restricted content?

The article does not address how the technology deals with false positives in the identification of restricted content. This is an important consideration as false positives can lead to unnecessary content removal or censorship.

What are the potential privacy implications of using neural networks to identify restricted content?

The article does not discuss the potential privacy implications of utilizing neural networks for content identification. It would be important to consider how user data is handled and protected in the process of identifying restricted content.


Original Abstract Submitted

Apparatuses, systems, and techniques are presented to identify and prevent generation of restricted content. In at least one embodiment, one or more neural networks are used to identify restricted content based only on the restricted content.