18366087. GRILLE SHUTTER simplified abstract (TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA)
Contents
GRILLE SHUTTER
Organization Name
TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Inventor(s)
Hideo Nishioka of Toyota-shi (JP)
Hiroki Sawada of Toyota-shi (JP)
GRILLE SHUTTER - A simplified explanation of the abstract
This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18366087 titled 'GRILLE SHUTTER
Simplified Explanation
The patent application describes a system with multiple movable fins, including a first fin connected to an actuator and a second fin linked to the first fin with a time difference mechanism. The time difference link allows the second fin to move independently from the first fin in certain positions but locks them together in others.
- The system includes multiple movable fins.
- A first fin is connected to an actuator.
- A second fin is linked to the first fin through a time difference mechanism.
- The time difference link allows independent movement of the second fin in certain positions.
- The second fin is locked to the first fin in other positions.
Potential Applications
This technology could be applied in:
- Marine propulsion systems
- Aircraft control surfaces
- Industrial automation
Problems Solved
This innovation addresses issues such as:
- Improving maneuverability
- Enhancing control precision
- Reducing mechanical complexity
Benefits
The benefits of this technology include:
- Increased efficiency
- Enhanced performance
- Greater flexibility in design
Potential Commercial Applications
This technology could be used in:
- Autonomous underwater vehicles
- Unmanned aerial vehicles
- Robotic manufacturing systems
Possible Prior Art
One possible prior art for this technology could be:
- Similar systems used in aerospace applications
Unanswered Questions
How does this technology compare to traditional systems with only one movable fin?
This article does not directly compare the performance or efficiency of this technology with traditional single-fin systems. It would be interesting to see a study or analysis on the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of using a time difference link in connecting movable fins?
The article does not discuss any potential challenges or limitations that may arise from using a time difference link. It would be valuable to explore any possible issues related to reliability, maintenance, or performance that could be associated with this mechanism.
Original Abstract Submitted
The plurality of movable fins includes at least a first movable fin coupled to the actuator and a second movable fin coupled to the first movable fin via a time difference link. The time difference link does not interlock the second movable fin with respect to the first movable fin while the first movable fin rotates from the closed position to the predetermined intermediate position, and interlocks the second movable fin with respect to the first movable fin while the first movable fin rotates from the intermediate position to the open position.