Capital one services, llc (20240345836). DYNAMIC REVIEW OF SOFTWARE UPDATES AFTER PULL REQUESTS simplified abstract

DYNAMIC REVIEW OF SOFTWARE UPDATES AFTER PULL REQUESTS

Organization Name

capital one services, llc

Inventor(s)

Tallulah Kay of Los Altos CA (US)

Benjamin Simon of WASHINGTON DC (US)

Christina Kim of San Ramon CA (US)

Naveed Khan of Bowie MD (US)

Ahmad Hassan Ibrahim of Centreville VA (US)

Jean-Etienne Lavallee of Richmond VA (US)

George Swain of Arlington VA (US)

Steven Almanzar of Arlington VA (US)

Andrew Kim of Fairfax VA (US)

Dominic Leone of Ashburn VA (US)

DYNAMIC REVIEW OF SOFTWARE UPDATES AFTER PULL REQUESTS - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 20240345836 titled 'DYNAMIC REVIEW OF SOFTWARE UPDATES AFTER PULL REQUESTS

Simplified Explanation: The system described in the patent application receives a difference file from a software repository, parses it to identify affected files and changes, applies rules from a rule dictionary to generate software review checklist items, and commits the changes based on user confirmation.

Key Features and Innovation:

• Receiving and parsing difference files from a software repository
• Identifying affected files and changes
• Applying rules from a rule dictionary
• Generating software review checklist items
• Committing changes based on user confirmation

Potential Applications: This technology can be used in software development processes to streamline code review and version control.

Problems Solved: This technology addresses the challenges of efficiently reviewing and managing changes in software code submissions.

Benefits:

• Improved code review process
• Enhanced version control
• Increased efficiency in software development workflows

Commercial Applications: Potential commercial applications include software development tools, version control systems, and code review platforms.

Prior Art: For prior art related to this technology, researchers can explore existing patents and publications in the field of software development tools and version control systems.

Frequently Updated Research: Researchers can stay updated on advancements in software development tools and version control systems to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of code review processes.

Questions about the Technology: 1. What are the key benefits of using this technology in software development? 2. How does this technology improve the code review process in comparison to traditional methods?

Original Abstract Submitted

in some implementations, a system may receive, from a software repository, a difference file indicating changes, to software code, that was submitted to the software repository. the system may parse the difference file to determine files, associated with the software code, affected by the changes and to determine content associated with the changes. the system may apply rules, from a rule dictionary, based on comparing identifiers, associated with the files, with identifiers included in the rules and based on comparing the content, associated with the changes, with content included in the rules. the system may generate software review checklist items based on applying the rules and output the software review checklist items for display. the system may receive, based on input from a user, confirmation of the changes and commit the changes to the software repository based on the confirmation.