Intel corporation (20240129234). MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES simplified abstract

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES

Organization Name

intel corporation

Inventor(s)

Hossein Farrokhbakht of Toronto (CA)

Fabrizio Petrini of Menlo Park CA (US)

MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 20240129234 titled 'MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES

Simplified Explanation

The patent application describes a router interface device that includes circuitry to proactively drop a packet and send a negative acknowledgement (NACK) message to a sender based on lack of buffer space for a response associated with the packet. This action is taken when congestion is detected at a downstream switch or at an endpoint receiver.

  • Router interface device with circuitry
  • Proactively drops packets
  • Sends NACK message to sender
  • Based on lack of buffer space or congestion
  • Detects congestion at downstream switch or endpoint receiver

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in network routers to efficiently manage packet traffic and prevent congestion issues.

Problems Solved

This technology helps prevent network congestion and ensures smooth data transmission by proactively managing packet flow.

Benefits

The benefits of this technology include improved network performance, reduced packet loss, and enhanced overall data transmission efficiency.

Potential Commercial Applications

This technology could be valuable for companies that rely on high-speed data transmission, such as internet service providers, telecommunications companies, and data centers.

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art could be existing network routers that manage packet traffic but may not have the proactive packet dropping and NACK message sending capabilities described in this patent application.

Unanswered Questions

How does this technology impact network latency?

This article does not address how the proactive dropping of packets and sending of NACK messages may affect network latency. It would be important to understand if these actions introduce any delays in data transmission.

What are the potential security implications of this technology?

The article does not discuss the security aspects of proactively dropping packets and sending NACK messages. It would be crucial to explore any vulnerabilities or risks associated with these actions in terms of network security.


Original Abstract Submitted

examples described herein relate to a router interface device. in some examples, the router includes an interface and circuitry. in some examples, the circuitry is to: proactively drop a packet and send a negative acknowledgement (nack) message to a sender based on lack of buffer space for a response associated with the packet and sent from a downstream network interface device that received the packet and also based on one or more of: congestion at a downstream switch or congestion at an endpoint receiver.