Honda motor co., ltd. (20240111915). EVALUATION SITE ACCURACY CONTROL METHOD AND PRODUCTION METHOD simplified abstract

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

EVALUATION SITE ACCURACY CONTROL METHOD AND PRODUCTION METHOD

Organization Name

honda motor co., ltd.

Inventor(s)

Jun Shiwaku of Tokyo (JP)

Yutaro Inoue of Tokyo (JP)

Kota Kobayashi of Tokyo (JP)

EVALUATION SITE ACCURACY CONTROL METHOD AND PRODUCTION METHOD - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 20240111915 titled 'EVALUATION SITE ACCURACY CONTROL METHOD AND PRODUCTION METHOD

Simplified Explanation

The production method described in the abstract involves analyzing a completed component using finite element analysis, extracting critical evaluation sites and corresponding joining areas, generating regression models, performing Bayesian estimation, selecting adjustment sites, and producing the completed component.

  • Finite element analysis to determine changes in evaluation sites when displacement is applied to joining areas
  • Extraction of critical evaluation sites with large changes and their corresponding critical joining areas
  • Generation of regression models through lasso regression
  • Bayesian estimation
  • Selection of adjustment sites for individual parts
  • Production of the completed component

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in various industries such as automotive, aerospace, and manufacturing for optimizing the production process of complex components.

Problems Solved

This technology helps in identifying critical areas in a completed component that may undergo changes when displacement is applied, allowing for adjustments to be made to improve the overall quality and performance.

Benefits

The benefits of this technology include improved accuracy in predicting changes in evaluation sites, enhanced efficiency in production processes, and overall cost savings by reducing the need for rework.

Potential Commercial Applications

"Optimizing Production Method for Completed Components: Enhancing Quality and Efficiency"

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art could be the use of finite element analysis in the production process of components to analyze stress and deformation. Another could be the use of regression models for predicting changes in evaluation sites.

Unanswered Questions

How does this technology compare to traditional methods of production optimization?

This article does not provide a direct comparison between this new production method and traditional methods. It would be beneficial to understand the specific advantages and disadvantages of this technology in comparison to existing practices.

What are the specific industries that could benefit the most from this technology?

While the potential applications mention various industries, a more detailed analysis of which specific industries could benefit the most from this technology would provide valuable insights for potential investors or stakeholders.


Original Abstract Submitted

provided is a production method for a completed component, the production method including: a first step for performing finite element analysis to determine an amount of change at evaluation sites of the completed component on a three-dimensional model of the completed component that occurs when displacement is applied to joining areas between the individual parts on the three-dimensional model; a second step for extracting combinations of critical evaluation sites having a relatively large amount of change among the evaluation sites on the three-dimensional model and their corresponding critical joining areas among the joining areas on the three-dimensional model; a third step for generating regression models through lasso regression; a fourth step for performing bayesian estimation; a fifth step for selecting an adjustment site of the individual parts; and a sixth step for producing the completed component.