Dell products l.p. (20240104468). MAINTENANCE BACKGROUND TASK REGULATION USING FEEDBACK FROM INSTRUMENTED WAITING POINTS simplified abstract
Contents
- 1 MAINTENANCE BACKGROUND TASK REGULATION USING FEEDBACK FROM INSTRUMENTED WAITING POINTS
- 1.1 Organization Name
- 1.2 Inventor(s)
- 1.3 MAINTENANCE BACKGROUND TASK REGULATION USING FEEDBACK FROM INSTRUMENTED WAITING POINTS - A simplified explanation of the abstract
- 1.4 Simplified Explanation
- 1.5 Potential Applications
- 1.6 Problems Solved
- 1.7 Benefits
- 1.8 Potential Commercial Applications
- 1.9 Possible Prior Art
- 1.10 Original Abstract Submitted
MAINTENANCE BACKGROUND TASK REGULATION USING FEEDBACK FROM INSTRUMENTED WAITING POINTS
Organization Name
Inventor(s)
Vladimir Shveidel of Pardes-Hana (IL)
Lior Kamran of Rishon LeZion (IL)
MAINTENANCE BACKGROUND TASK REGULATION USING FEEDBACK FROM INSTRUMENTED WAITING POINTS - A simplified explanation of the abstract
This abstract first appeared for US patent application 20240104468 titled 'MAINTENANCE BACKGROUND TASK REGULATION USING FEEDBACK FROM INSTRUMENTED WAITING POINTS
Simplified Explanation
The patent application abstract describes a method for regulating maintenance background task activity using instrumented waiting points. This involves collecting feedback metrics for the waiting points, determining criteria based on the collected metrics, and reducing the activity level of maintenance background tasks based on the criteria being met.
- Collecting feedback metrics for waiting points:
- Each waiting point is instrumented to collect metrics such as average waiting time and the percentage of resource requests from maintenance background tasks.
- Determining criteria and collected feedback metrics:
- Criteria include evaluating if a waiting point exceeds a waiting time threshold and has a high share of maintenance background requests.
- Performing processing to reduce activity level:
- If the criteria are met for at least one waiting point, processing is performed to decrease the current activity level of maintenance background tasks.
Potential Applications
This technology could be applied in various industries where maintenance tasks need to be regulated and optimized for efficiency.
Problems Solved
This innovation helps in managing and controlling maintenance background task activity to prevent bottlenecks and improve overall system performance.
Benefits
The use of instrumented waiting points allows for real-time monitoring and adjustment of maintenance task activity, leading to smoother operations and reduced downtime.
Potential Commercial Applications
This technology could be valuable in industries such as manufacturing, logistics, and IT, where efficient maintenance task management is crucial for operational success.
Possible Prior Art
One possible prior art could be systems that monitor and optimize task scheduling in various industries, but the specific use of instrumented waiting points for regulating maintenance background task activity may be a novel approach.
Unanswered Questions
How does this technology compare to traditional maintenance task management methods?
This article does not provide a direct comparison between this innovative approach and traditional methods of managing maintenance tasks. It would be interesting to know the specific advantages and disadvantages of using instrumented waiting points for this purpose.
What are the potential challenges or limitations of implementing this technology in different industries?
While the abstract outlines the benefits and applications of this technology, it does not address any potential challenges or limitations that may arise when implementing it in various industries. Understanding these factors could provide a more comprehensive view of the feasibility and effectiveness of the innovation.
Original Abstract Submitted
regulating maintenance background (bg) task activity using instrumented waiting points (wps) can include: collecting feedback metrics for the wps, where each wp is instrumented to collect a set of feedback metrics including an average waiting time and a first value denoting a portion of resource requests received at the wp which are from maintenance bg tasks; determining, in accordance with criteria and collected feedback metrics, whether the criteria is true for at least a first wp associated with a set of feedback metrics, wherein the criteria includes determining whether the first wp has an associated average waiting time of the set which exceeds a waiting time threshold, and whether the first wp has a share of maintenance bg requests exceeding a minimum; and responsive to determining that the criteria is true for at least the first wp, performing processing to reduce a current activity level of said maintenance bg tasks.
