18453059. AUTHORIZATION OF STATES IN A STATEFUL SIGNATURE SCHEME simplified abstract (HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.)

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

AUTHORIZATION OF STATES IN A STATEFUL SIGNATURE SCHEME

Organization Name

HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.

Inventor(s)

Thalia May Laing of Bristol (GB)

Maugan Villatel of Bristol (GB)

Pierre Louis Robert Belgarric of Bristol (GB)

Adrian John Baldwin of Bristol (GB)

Adrian Laurence Shaw of Bristol (GB)

Remy Husson of Bristol (GB)

AUTHORIZATION OF STATES IN A STATEFUL SIGNATURE SCHEME - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18453059 titled 'AUTHORIZATION OF STATES IN A STATEFUL SIGNATURE SCHEME

Simplified Explanation

The computing device described in the patent application is designed to receive a request from a signer for a state to be used in generating a key under a stateful signature scheme. The device then identifies an available state that the signer is authorized to use and sends a reply to the signer indicating the authorized state.

  • The computing device has an interface to receive requests from signers for states.
  • It includes a processor to identify an available state for the signer to use.
  • The device instructs a reply to be sent to the signer with the authorized state.

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in secure communication systems, digital signatures, and authentication processes.

Problems Solved

This technology solves the problem of securely managing states in stateful signature schemes and ensuring that signers are authorized to use specific states.

Benefits

The benefits of this technology include enhanced security, improved authorization control, and efficient management of states in signature schemes.

Potential Commercial Applications

One potential commercial application of this technology could be in secure messaging platforms for businesses, where stateful signature schemes are used to verify the authenticity of messages.

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art for this technology could be existing stateful signature schemes used in cryptographic systems.

Unanswered Questions

How does this technology handle state transitions between signers?

This article does not address how the computing device manages state transitions between different signers and ensures the security of the transition process.

What measures are in place to prevent unauthorized access to states by malicious actors?

The article does not provide information on the security measures implemented to prevent unauthorized access to states by malicious actors and protect the integrity of the stateful signature scheme.


Original Abstract Submitted

In an example, a computing device is described. The computing device comprises an interface to receive a request from a signer for a state. The state is to be used as an input to generate a key under a stateful signature scheme. The computing device further comprises a processor. The processor is to identify an available state that the signer is authorized to use in response to the request received via the interface. The available state is identified from a set of states that can be used by the signer to maintain statefulness of the stateful signature scheme. The processor is further to instruct a reply to be sent to the signer via the interface. The reply comprises an indication of the state that the signer is authorized to use.