18391565. MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES simplified abstract (Intel Corporation)

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES

Organization Name

Intel Corporation

Inventor(s)

Hossein Farrokhbakht of Toronto (CA)

Fabrizio Petrini of Menlo Park CA (US)

MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18391565 titled 'MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES

Simplified Explanation

The abstract describes a router with circuitry that can determine if an incoming packet is headed towards a faulty link, based on information received in a negative acknowledgment message, and drop the packet before it reaches the faulty link.

  • The router includes an interface and circuitry coupled to the interface.
  • The circuitry can determine if an incoming packet is meant for a faulty link based on information from a received negative acknowledgment message.
  • If the packet is destined for the faulty link, the router will drop the packet one or more hops before it reaches the faulty link.

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in network routers to improve network reliability by preventing packets from reaching faulty links.

Problems Solved

1. Preventing packets from being lost or delayed due to faulty links in a network. 2. Enhancing network performance by efficiently handling packets destined for faulty links.

Benefits

1. Improved network reliability and performance. 2. Reduction in packet loss and delays. 3. Enhanced overall network efficiency.

Potential Commercial Applications

Optimizing network routers for improved performance and reliability in various industries such as telecommunications, data centers, and cloud computing.

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art could be the use of routing protocols that reroute packets in case of link failures, but the specific method described in the patent application may offer a more targeted and efficient approach to handling faulty links.

Unanswered Questions

How does this technology impact network latency?

This article does not address how dropping packets before reaching a faulty link may affect network latency. Further research or testing may be needed to determine the impact on latency.

What are the potential security implications of dropping packets in this manner?

The article does not discuss any potential security risks associated with dropping packets before reaching a faulty link. It would be important to consider how this method may impact network security and data integrity.


Original Abstract Submitted

Examples described herein relate to a router. In some examples, the router includes an interface and circuitry coupled to the interface. In some examples, the circuitry is to determine whether an incoming packet is to reach a faulty link based on a fault location received in a received negative acknowledgment (NACK) message and based on a determination that the incoming packet is to reach the faulty link, drop the packet one or multiple hops before reaching the faulty link.