18178476. DISK DEVICE simplified abstract (TOSHIBA ELECTRONIC DEVICES & STORAGE CORPORATION)
Contents
DISK DEVICE
Organization Name
TOSHIBA ELECTRONIC DEVICES & STORAGE CORPORATION
Inventor(s)
Yusuke Nojima of Yokohama Kanagawa (JP)
DISK DEVICE - A simplified explanation of the abstract
This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18178476 titled 'DISK DEVICE
Simplified Explanation
The patent application describes a disk device with a unique configuration involving a magnetic head, a piezoelectric element, and a flexure. The piezoelectric element has two electrodes, while the flexure consists of two parts that swing - one part with a first electrode and the other part with the magnetic head. The magnetic head faces both surfaces of the flexure, with specific distances between them.
- Magnetic head, piezoelectric element, and flexure configuration
- Piezoelectric element with two electrodes
- Flexure with two swinging parts, one with an electrode and the other with the magnetic head
- Specific distances between the surfaces of the flexure and the magnetic head
Potential Applications
The technology described in the patent application could potentially be applied in:
- Hard disk drives
- Data storage devices
- Magnetic recording systems
Problems Solved
The innovation addresses the following issues:
- Precision in positioning the magnetic head
- Stability and durability of the disk device
- Efficiency in data reading and writing processes
Benefits
The technology offers the following benefits:
- Improved performance and reliability of disk devices
- Enhanced data storage capabilities
- Increased speed and accuracy in data processing
Potential Commercial Applications
The technology could find commercial applications in:
- Consumer electronics
- Information technology
- Data centers
Possible Prior Art
One possible prior art for this technology could be:
- Traditional disk devices with different configurations and mechanisms
Unanswered Questions
How does this technology compare to existing disk device configurations in terms of performance and durability?
The article does not provide a direct comparison between this technology and existing disk device configurations. It would be beneficial to have data or studies showing the performance and durability differences between them.
What are the potential challenges or limitations of implementing this technology in mass-produced disk devices?
The article does not address any challenges or limitations that may arise when implementing this technology on a larger scale. It would be important to consider factors such as cost, manufacturing processes, and compatibility with existing systems.
Original Abstract Submitted
According to one embodiment, a disk device includes a magnetic head, a piezoelectric element and a flexure. The piezoelectric element includes two electrodes. The flexure includes a first part and a second part that swings. The first part has a first surface to which a first electrode is joined. The second part has a second surface to which the magnetic head is joined. The magnetic head has a third surface facing the first surface and the second surface. The first electrode is spaced apart from a second electrode in a first direction. The first surface and an end of the third surface face each other. The second surface and another end of the third surface face each other. A distance between the first surface and the one end of the third surface is longer than a distance between the second surface and the other end of the third surface.
