17957990. MOTOR ADJUSTMENTS IN ABSENCE OF MOTOR DRIVE SIGNAL simplified abstract (Cilag GmbH International)

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

MOTOR ADJUSTMENTS IN ABSENCE OF MOTOR DRIVE SIGNAL

Organization Name

Cilag GmbH International

Inventor(s)

Frederick E. Shelton, Iv of Hillsboro OH (US)

Shane R. Adams of Lebanon OH (US)

MOTOR ADJUSTMENTS IN ABSENCE OF MOTOR DRIVE SIGNAL - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 17957990 titled 'MOTOR ADJUSTMENTS IN ABSENCE OF MOTOR DRIVE SIGNAL

Simplified Explanation

The patent application describes a surgical system with an end effector that can be configured between an open state and a clamped state. The system includes a drive system with a motor and a drive assembly to perform tissue-treatment motions, controlled by a motor control system.

  • The end effector is configurable between an open state and a clamped state.
  • The system includes a drive system with a motor and a drive assembly for tissue-treatment motion.
  • The motor control system can modify tissue-treatment motion independently of the motor drive signal.

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in minimally invasive surgical procedures, robotic surgery, and other medical interventions requiring precise tissue manipulation.

Problems Solved

This technology solves the problem of achieving accurate and controlled tissue-treatment motions during surgical procedures, improving the overall effectiveness and safety of the operation.

Benefits

The benefits of this technology include enhanced precision in tissue manipulation, reduced risk of damage to surrounding tissues, and improved outcomes for patients undergoing surgical procedures.

Potential Commercial Applications

Potential commercial applications for this technology include medical device manufacturing, surgical equipment development, and healthcare institutions looking to upgrade their surgical systems.

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art for this technology could be robotic surgical systems with end effectors capable of performing tissue-treatment motions. However, the specific features and functionalities described in this patent application may distinguish it from existing technologies.

Unanswered Questions

How does this technology compare to existing surgical systems with similar functionalities?

This article does not provide a direct comparison with existing surgical systems or technologies in the market. It would be beneficial to understand the specific advantages and differences of this innovation compared to others.

What are the potential regulatory considerations for implementing this technology in medical settings?

The article does not address the regulatory aspects of introducing this technology into medical practice. Understanding the regulatory pathway and requirements for approval could be crucial for successful commercialization.


Original Abstract Submitted

Disclosed is a surgical system, comprising an end effector configurable between an open state and a clamped state. The end effector comprises a first jaw and a second jaw moveable relative to the first jaw. The surgical system further comprises a drive system, comprising a motor and a drive assembly movable by the motor to effect a tissue-treatment motion at the end effector. The surgical system further comprises a motor control system comprising motor control electronics. The motor control system is configured to transmit a motor drive signal that causes the motor to move the drive assembly to effect the tissue-treatment motion at the end effector and control the motor control electronics to modify the tissue-treatment motion independent of the motor drive signal.