17956100. SLEW-RATE CONTROL FOR POWER STAGES simplified abstract (TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED)

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

SLEW-RATE CONTROL FOR POWER STAGES

Organization Name

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED

Inventor(s)

Maik Peter Kaufmann of FREISING (DE)

Stefan Herzer of MARZLING (DE)

Michael Lueders of FREISING (DE)

SLEW-RATE CONTROL FOR POWER STAGES - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 17956100 titled 'SLEW-RATE CONTROL FOR POWER STAGES

Simplified Explanation

The patent application describes a circuit with a half-bridge configuration that provides a switching voltage based on high-side and low-side drive signals. The circuit includes high-side slew control circuitry, a high-side driver, low-side slew control circuitry, a low-side driver, and a capacitor for converting the slew rate to a slew current signal.

  • The circuit includes a half-bridge configuration.
  • High-side slew control circuitry generates a high-side slew-compensated control signal.
  • A high-side driver responds to the high-side slew-compensated control signal.
  • Low-side slew control circuitry generates a low-side slew-compensated drive signal.
  • A low-side driver responds to the low-side slew-compensated drive signal.
  • A capacitor converts the slew rate to a slew current signal.

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in power electronics, motor control systems, and renewable energy systems.

Problems Solved

This technology helps in improving the efficiency and control of half-bridge circuits by providing slew rate compensation.

Benefits

The benefits of this technology include enhanced performance, increased efficiency, and improved reliability in electronic systems.

Potential Commercial Applications

One potential commercial application of this technology could be in the development of advanced motor control systems for electric vehicles.

Possible Prior Art

Prior art may include similar circuit configurations used in power electronics and motor control systems.

Unanswered Questions

How does this technology compare to existing slew rate compensation methods in terms of efficiency and performance?

This article does not provide a direct comparison with existing slew rate compensation methods, leaving the reader to wonder about the advantages of this specific approach.

Are there any limitations or drawbacks to implementing this circuit in practical applications?

The article does not address any potential limitations or drawbacks that may arise when implementing this circuit in real-world scenarios, leaving room for further exploration and analysis.


Original Abstract Submitted

A circuit includes a half-bridge circuit is configured to provide a switching voltage responsive to respective high-side and low-side drive signals. High-side slew control circuitry is configured to provide a high-side slew-compensated control signal responsive to a high-side enable signal and a slew current signal representative of a slew rate at a switching output. A high-side driver is configured to provide the high-side drive signal responsive to the high-side slew-compensated control signal. Low-side slew control circuitry is configured to provide a low-side slew-compensated drive signal responsive to a low-side enable signal and the slew current signal. A low-side driver is configured to provide the low-side drive signal responsive to the low-side slew-compensated control signal. A capacitor is coupled between the high-side and low-side slew control circuitry and is configured to convert the slew rate to the slew current signal.