Texas instruments incorporated (20240113851). METHODS AND APPARATUS TO REDUCE RETIMER LATENCY AND JITTER simplified abstract

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

METHODS AND APPARATUS TO REDUCE RETIMER LATENCY AND JITTER

Organization Name

texas instruments incorporated

Inventor(s)

Ani Xavier of Bangalore (IN)

Jagannathan Venkataraman of Bangalore (IN)

METHODS AND APPARATUS TO REDUCE RETIMER LATENCY AND JITTER - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 20240113851 titled 'METHODS AND APPARATUS TO REDUCE RETIMER LATENCY AND JITTER

Simplified Explanation

The abstract describes a system with interleaving circuitry and handoff circuitry that work together to convert data streams from multiple clock sources to a single transmission clock.

  • The interleaving circuitry includes a data input, multiple data outputs, and multiple clock inputs.
  • The handoff circuitry includes comparison circuitry to compare receiver clocks to the transmission clock, clock configuration circuitry to select a receiver clock, and flip-flops to convert data outputs to the transmission clock.

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in telecommunications systems, data processing systems, and networking equipment where data streams need to be synchronized from multiple sources.

Problems Solved

This technology solves the problem of efficiently converting data streams from multiple clock sources to a single transmission clock without losing data or causing delays.

Benefits

The benefits of this technology include improved data transmission efficiency, reduced latency, and simplified synchronization processes in complex systems.

Potential Commercial Applications

A potential commercial application of this technology could be in the development of high-speed data communication equipment for industries such as telecommunications, data centers, and networking.

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art for this technology could be existing systems that perform clock synchronization and data conversion, but may not offer the same level of efficiency and flexibility as the described system.

Unanswered Questions

How does this technology compare to existing clock synchronization methods in terms of efficiency and accuracy?

This article does not provide a direct comparison with existing clock synchronization methods, leaving the reader to wonder about the advantages and disadvantages of this technology in relation to current practices.

What are the potential limitations or challenges in implementing this technology in real-world systems?

The article does not address the potential obstacles or complexities that may arise when integrating this technology into practical applications, leaving room for speculation on the feasibility and scalability of the system.


Original Abstract Submitted

an example system includes: interleaving circuitry including a data input, a plurality of data outputs, and a plurality of clock inputs, the data input coupled to the received data input and each of the plurality of clock inputs coupled to one of the plurality of receiver clock outputs; and handoff circuitry coupled to the interleaving circuitry, the handoff circuitry including: comparison circuitry coupled to the clock generation circuitry and configured to compare the plurality of receiver clocks to the transmission clock; clock configuration circuitry coupled to the comparison circuitry and configured to select one of the plurality of receiver clocks based on the comparison circuitry; and a plurality of flip-flops coupled to the clock configuration circuitry and configured to convert the plurality of data outputs from the plurality of receiver clocks to the transmission clock to generate a plurality of transmission data streams based on the one of the plurality of receiver clocks selected by the clock configuration circuitry.