Texas instruments incorporated (20240111001). FLUXGATE MAGNETIC SENSOR simplified abstract

FLUXGATE MAGNETIC SENSOR

Organization Name

texas instruments incorporated

Inventor(s)

Preetinder Garcha of RICHARDSON TX (US)

Srinath Ramaswamy of MURPHY TX (US)

Viola Schaeffer of Freising (DE)

FLUXGATE MAGNETIC SENSOR - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 20240111001 titled 'FLUXGATE MAGNETIC SENSOR

Simplified Explanation

The apparatus described in the abstract consists of a first coil, a second coil, a control circuit, and a processing circuit. The second coil is magnetically coupled to the first coil, and the control circuit is responsible for selecting a field strength level and providing a signal representing the selected level. The processing circuit, on the other hand, sets a state representing the polarity of a magnetic field sensed by the second coil.

• The apparatus includes a first coil, a second coil, a control circuit, and a processing circuit.
• The control circuit selects a field strength level from a set of discrete levels and provides a signal representing the selected level.
• The processing circuit sets a state representing the polarity of a magnetic field sensed by the second coil.

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in industries such as telecommunications, automotive, and robotics for tasks requiring precise control of magnetic fields.

Problems Solved

This technology solves the problem of accurately controlling and sensing magnetic fields in various applications, leading to improved efficiency and performance.

Benefits

The benefits of this technology include enhanced precision in magnetic field control, increased reliability in sensing magnetic fields, and improved overall system performance.

Potential Commercial Applications

• "Enhancing Magnetic Field Control in Telecommunications and Robotics"

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art could be the use of similar coil and circuit configurations in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines for medical imaging purposes.

How does this technology compare to existing magnetic field control systems in terms of efficiency and accuracy?

This article does not provide a direct comparison with existing magnetic field control systems, leaving the reader to wonder about the specific advantages of this technology over current solutions.

What are the potential limitations or challenges in implementing this technology in real-world applications?

The article does not address any potential limitations or challenges that may arise when implementing this technology, leaving room for speculation on the practicality of its use.

Original Abstract Submitted

in some examples, an apparatus comprises a first coil, a second coil, a control circuit, and a processing circuit. the second coil is magnetically coupled to the first coil. the control circuit has a signal output coupled to the first coil, and a control output, and the control circuit configured to: responsive to a state of the control input, select a field strength level from a set of discrete field strength levels; and provide a first signal representing the selected field strength level at the signal output. also, the processing circuit has processing inputs and a processing output, the processing inputs coupled to the second coil, the processing output coupled to the control input, and the processing circuit configured to, responsive to a second signal across the processing inputs, set a state of the processing output representing a polarity of a magnetic field sensed by the second coil.