Google llc (20240095555). Moderation of User-Generated Content simplified abstract

From WikiPatents
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Moderation of User-Generated Content

Organization Name

google llc

Inventor(s)

Luca De Alfaro of Mountain View CA (US)

Ashutosh Kulshreshtha of Sunnyvale CA (US)

Mitchell Slep of San Francisco CA (US)

Nicu Daniel Cornea of Santa Clara CA (US)

Sowmya Subramanian of San Francisco CA (US)

Ethan G. Russell of Jersey City NJ (US)

Moderation of User-Generated Content - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 20240095555 titled 'Moderation of User-Generated Content

Simplified Explanation

The patent application describes a system and method for updating and correcting facts by receiving proposed values from users, determining a correctness score, and automatically accepting or rejecting the proposed values based on this score.

  • The system receives proposed values for facts from users.
  • It determines a correctness score for the proposed values.
  • Based on the correctness score, the system automatically accepts or rejects the proposed values.

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in various fields such as:

  • Data verification and validation processes.
  • Fact-checking in news and media industries.

Problems Solved

This technology addresses the following issues:

  • Ensuring accuracy and reliability of information.
  • Streamlining the process of fact-checking and data correction.

Benefits

The benefits of this technology include:

  • Improved data quality and integrity.
  • Time and cost savings in fact-checking processes.

Potential Commercial Applications

A potential commercial application of this technology could be:

  • Integration into online platforms and databases for real-time fact verification.

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art for this technology could be:

  • Fact-checking software used in journalism and research industries.

Unanswered Questions

How does the system handle conflicting proposed values for the same fact?

The system's algorithm for resolving conflicting proposed values is not specified in the abstract.

What measures are in place to prevent manipulation of the correctness score by users?

The abstract does not mention any specific safeguards against potential manipulation of the correctness score by users.


Original Abstract Submitted

a system and method for updating and correcting facts that receives proposed values for facts from users and determines a correctness score which is used to automatically accept or reject the proposed values.