18391521. MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES simplified abstract (Intel Corporation)
Contents
- 1 MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES
- 1.1 Organization Name
- 1.2 Inventor(s)
- 1.3 MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES - A simplified explanation of the abstract
- 1.4 Simplified Explanation
- 1.5 Potential Applications
- 1.6 Problems Solved
- 1.7 Benefits
- 1.8 Potential Commercial Applications
- 1.9 Possible Prior Art
- 1.10 Original Abstract Submitted
MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES
Organization Name
Inventor(s)
Hossein Farrokhbakht of Toronto (CA)
Fabrizio Petrini of Menlo Park CA (US)
MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES - A simplified explanation of the abstract
This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18391521 titled 'MANAGEMENT OF PACKET TRANSMISSION AND RESPONSES
Simplified Explanation
The patent application describes a router interface device that can proactively drop a packet and send a negative acknowledgement (NACK) message to a sender based on lack of buffer space for a response associated with the packet. This decision is made based on congestion at a downstream switch or congestion at an endpoint receiver.
- The router interface device includes an interface and circuitry.
- The circuitry is designed to drop packets and send NACK messages based on buffer space availability and congestion.
- The decision to drop a packet and send a NACK message is based on congestion at a downstream switch or endpoint receiver.
Potential Applications
This technology could be applied in network routers to improve network traffic management and reduce congestion by proactively handling packet drops.
Problems Solved
This technology helps address network congestion issues by efficiently managing packet drops and communication with senders.
Benefits
The benefits of this technology include improved network performance, reduced congestion, and better overall network reliability.
Potential Commercial Applications
One potential commercial application of this technology could be in data centers or large-scale networks where efficient traffic management is crucial for optimal performance.
Possible Prior Art
One possible prior art could be existing network routers that handle packet drops reactively rather than proactively, leading to potential congestion issues.
Unanswered Questions
How does this technology impact network latency?
This article does not address how the proactive dropping of packets and sending of NACK messages may affect network latency. It would be important to understand if this technology introduces any latency issues in network communication.
What are the potential security implications of proactively dropping packets?
The article does not discuss the security implications of proactively dropping packets and sending NACK messages. It would be essential to consider how this technology may impact network security and potential vulnerabilities that could arise.
Original Abstract Submitted
Examples described herein relate to a router interface device. In some examples, the router includes an interface and circuitry. In some examples, the circuitry is to: proactively drop a packet and send a negative acknowledgement (NACK) message to a sender based on lack of buffer space for a response associated with the packet and sent from a downstream network interface device that received the packet and also based on one or more of: congestion at a downstream switch or congestion at an endpoint receiver.
