18366087. GRILLE SHUTTER simplified abstract (TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA)

From WikiPatents
Revision as of 05:57, 26 April 2024 by Wikipatents (talk | contribs) (Creating a new page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GRILLE SHUTTER

Organization Name

TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA

Inventor(s)

Hideo Nishioka of Toyota-shi (JP)

Hiroki Sawada of Toyota-shi (JP)

GRILLE SHUTTER - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18366087 titled 'GRILLE SHUTTER

Simplified Explanation

The patent application describes a system with multiple movable fins, including a first fin connected to an actuator and a second fin linked to the first fin with a time difference mechanism. The time difference link allows the second fin to move independently from the first fin in certain positions but locks them together in others.

  • The system includes multiple movable fins.
  • A first fin is connected to an actuator.
  • A second fin is linked to the first fin through a time difference mechanism.
  • The time difference link allows independent movement of the second fin in certain positions.
  • The second fin is locked to the first fin in other positions.

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in:

  • Marine propulsion systems
  • Aircraft control surfaces
  • Industrial automation

Problems Solved

This innovation addresses issues such as:

  • Improving maneuverability
  • Enhancing control precision
  • Reducing mechanical complexity

Benefits

The benefits of this technology include:

  • Increased efficiency
  • Enhanced performance
  • Greater flexibility in design

Potential Commercial Applications

This technology could be used in:

  • Autonomous underwater vehicles
  • Unmanned aerial vehicles
  • Robotic manufacturing systems

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art for this technology could be:

  • Similar systems used in aerospace applications

Unanswered Questions

How does this technology compare to traditional systems with only one movable fin?

This article does not directly compare the performance or efficiency of this technology with traditional single-fin systems. It would be interesting to see a study or analysis on the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of using a time difference link in connecting movable fins?

The article does not discuss any potential challenges or limitations that may arise from using a time difference link. It would be valuable to explore any possible issues related to reliability, maintenance, or performance that could be associated with this mechanism.


Original Abstract Submitted

The plurality of movable fins includes at least a first movable fin coupled to the actuator and a second movable fin coupled to the first movable fin via a time difference link. The time difference link does not interlock the second movable fin with respect to the first movable fin while the first movable fin rotates from the closed position to the predetermined intermediate position, and interlocks the second movable fin with respect to the first movable fin while the first movable fin rotates from the intermediate position to the open position.