18134958. RUNTIME DEPENDENCY CONFIGURATION UTILITY simplified abstract (Insight Direct USA, Inc.)

From WikiPatents
Revision as of 03:31, 16 April 2024 by Wikipatents (talk | contribs) (Creating a new page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RUNTIME DEPENDENCY CONFIGURATION UTILITY

Organization Name

Insight Direct USA, Inc.

Inventor(s)

James Wilcox of Merrimack NH (US)

RUNTIME DEPENDENCY CONFIGURATION UTILITY - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18134958 titled 'RUNTIME DEPENDENCY CONFIGURATION UTILITY

Simplified Explanation

The patent application describes a method for executing an application with multiple mutually-exclusive dependencies associated with an interface. The method involves scanning a repository of implementations, filtering them based on configuration keys, selecting one implementation for dependency injection, and initializing configurations specific to the injected dependency.

  • Scanning repository of implementations using a configuration utility
  • Filtering implementations based on configuration keys
  • Selecting one implementation for dependency injection
  • Initializing configurations specific to the injected dependency

Potential Applications

The technology described in the patent application could be applied in various industries such as software development, system integration, and automation processes.

Problems Solved

This technology solves the problem of managing multiple dependencies in an application, ensuring that the correct implementation is selected and configured based on specific requirements.

Benefits

The benefits of this technology include improved efficiency in application execution, streamlined dependency management, and enhanced customization options for different configurations.

Potential Commercial Applications

The technology could be commercially applied in software development tools, application frameworks, and system integration platforms to optimize dependency management processes.

Possible Prior Art

One possible prior art for this technology could be dependency injection frameworks in software development, which also focus on managing dependencies and configurations within applications.

Unanswered Questions

How does this technology compare to existing dependency injection frameworks in terms of performance and flexibility?

This article does not provide a direct comparison between this technology and existing dependency injection frameworks in terms of performance and flexibility. Further research and testing would be needed to evaluate these aspects.

What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of implementing this method in real-world applications?

The article does not address any potential limitations or drawbacks of implementing this method in real-world applications. It would be important to consider factors such as scalability, compatibility, and maintenance requirements when applying this technology.


Original Abstract Submitted

A method is presented for executing an application having multiple mutually-exclusive possible dependencies associated with an interface. First, a repository of implementations is scanned using a configuration utility to identify a subset of the implementations tagged for usability with the configuration utility. The configuration utility identifies keys within each of the subset of implementations, and filters the implementations by these configuration keys. The configuration utility scans configurations for a match with any of the identified configuration keys, and selects one implementation from among the subset of the implementations for dependency injection based on matching of configurations with the identified configuration keys. The configuration utility then injects a dependency using the selected implementation, and initializes configurations specific to the injected dependency.