18049261. CONFIGURED GRANTS AND SEMI-PERSISTENT SCHEDULING FALLING IN A PARTIALLY FULL DUPLEX SLOT simplified abstract (QUALCOMM Incorporated)

CONFIGURED GRANTS AND SEMI-PERSISTENT SCHEDULING FALLING IN A PARTIALLY FULL DUPLEX SLOT

Organization Name

QUALCOMM Incorporated

Inventor(s)

Ahmed Attia Abotabl of San Diego CA (US)

Marwen Zorgui of San Diego CA (US)

Muhammad Sayed Khairy Abdelghaffar of San Jose CA (US)

Abdelrahman Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim of San Diego CA (US)

CONFIGURED GRANTS AND SEMI-PERSISTENT SCHEDULING FALLING IN A PARTIALLY FULL DUPLEX SLOT - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 18049261 titled 'CONFIGURED GRANTS AND SEMI-PERSISTENT SCHEDULING FALLING IN A PARTIALLY FULL DUPLEX SLOT

Simplified Explanation

The patent application abstract describes a method for handling CG or SPS occasions in partially full-duplex slots, allowing for efficient communication between a UE and a base station without errors or dropped occasions.

• UE receives indication of CG or SPS configuration
• UE determines overlap of CG or SPS occasion in SBFD symbol
• UE communicates with base station based on modification to occasion
• Enables handling of CG or SPS occasions in partially full-duplex slots

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in wireless communication systems, such as 5G networks, to improve efficiency and reliability of data transmission.

Problems Solved

1. Efficient handling of CG or SPS occasions in partially full-duplex slots 2. Avoiding error conditions or dropped occasions during communication

Benefits

1. Improved communication reliability 2. Enhanced efficiency in data transmission 3. Seamless handling of CG or SPS occasions in challenging slot conditions

Potential Commercial Applications

Optimizing wireless communication systems for better performance and reliability in various scenarios.

Possible Prior Art

Prior art in the field of wireless communication systems may include methods for handling overlapping occasions in different slot configurations, but specific solutions for partially full-duplex slots may not have been addressed.

How does this technology impact overall network performance?

This article does not delve into the broader implications of implementing this technology on network performance. It would be interesting to explore how this method affects network capacity, latency, and overall efficiency.

Are there any limitations to the implementation of this technology?

The article does not discuss any potential limitations or challenges that may arise when implementing this method. It would be beneficial to understand any constraints or drawbacks associated with using this technology in real-world scenarios.

Original Abstract Submitted

Aspects are provided which allow for a UE or a base station to handle CG or SPS occasions that fall in a partially full-duplex slot. Initially, the UE receives an indication of a configured grant (CG) or a semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) configuration for allocating CG or SPS occasions. Next, the UE determines whether the CG or SPS occasion overlaps in at least one SBFD symbol in a partially full-duplex slot based on the CG or SPS configuration. Afterwards, the UE communicates with a base station according to a modification to the CG or SPS occasion based on the CG or SPS occasion overlapping in at least one SBFD symbol in the partially full-duplex slot. As a result, the UE and the base station may handle instances where a CG or SPS occasion falls in a partially full-duplex slot without identifying an error conditions or simply dropping the CG or SPS occasion.