17961347. DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION BANDWIDTH CONTRACTS BETWEEN HUB AND SPOKE DEVICES simplified abstract (HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP)

From WikiPatents
Revision as of 03:53, 16 April 2024 by Wikipatents (talk | contribs) (Creating a new page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION BANDWIDTH CONTRACTS BETWEEN HUB AND SPOKE DEVICES

Organization Name

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP

Inventor(s)

Gopalakrishnan Gunasekaran of Santa Clara CA (US)

Shreekanth Chandranna of Cupertino CA (US)

Naveed M. Shaik of San Jose CA (US)

Bhagvan B. Cheeyandira of San Jose CA (US)

DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION BANDWIDTH CONTRACTS BETWEEN HUB AND SPOKE DEVICES - A simplified explanation of the abstract

This abstract first appeared for US patent application 17961347 titled 'DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION BANDWIDTH CONTRACTS BETWEEN HUB AND SPOKE DEVICES

Simplified Explanation

The abstract describes a system and method for configuring a plurality of branch gateway (BGW) devices coupled to a virtual private network concentrator (VPNC). The VPNC negotiates transmission bandwidth contracts with BGW devices, allocates additional bandwidth as needed, and updates contracts accordingly.

  • Negotiation of transmission bandwidth contracts between VPNC and BGW devices
  • Allocation of additional bandwidth to BGW devices based on traffic patterns
  • Updating transmission bandwidth contracts by adjusting upper bandwidth limits
  • Revocation of additional bandwidth allocation by VPNC after a timer expires

Potential Applications

This technology could be applied in various networking environments where dynamic allocation of bandwidth to different devices is required, such as in enterprise networks, data centers, or cloud computing infrastructures.

Problems Solved

1. Efficient utilization of network resources by dynamically allocating bandwidth based on traffic patterns. 2. Simplifying the management of bandwidth allocation across multiple devices in a network.

Benefits

1. Improved network performance by optimizing bandwidth allocation in real-time. 2. Enhanced scalability and flexibility in managing network resources. 3. Cost-effective utilization of bandwidth by allocating resources where they are needed most.

Potential Commercial Applications

Optimizing network performance in large-scale enterprise networks Enhancing cloud computing infrastructure efficiency through dynamic bandwidth allocation Improving data center management by efficiently allocating resources based on demand

Possible Prior Art

Prior art may include existing systems or methods for dynamic bandwidth allocation in network environments, such as Quality of Service (QoS) mechanisms or traffic shaping techniques.

What is the impact of this technology on network performance?

This technology can significantly improve network performance by dynamically allocating bandwidth to devices based on demand, ensuring efficient resource utilization and optimal data transmission speeds.

How does this technology compare to traditional static bandwidth allocation methods?

Unlike traditional static bandwidth allocation methods, this technology offers flexibility and scalability by adjusting bandwidth allocation in real-time based on traffic patterns and demand, leading to improved network efficiency and performance.


Original Abstract Submitted

One aspect can provide a system and method for configuring a plurality of branch gateway (BGW) devices coupled to a virtual private network concentrator (VPNC). The VPNC negotiates with a respective BGW device a transmission-bandwidth contract; receives, from the BGW device, a request for additional transmission bandwidth; analyzes traffic patterns to identify one or more BGW devices with unused bandwidth; allocates the requested additional transmission bandwidth to the respective BGW device by reducing transmission bandwidth allocated to the identified one or more BGW devices; and transmits contract-update notifications to the BGW devices to allow each BGW device to update a corresponding transmission-bandwidth contract, which comprises increasing the upper bandwidth limit at the respective BGW device while reducing the upper bandwidth limit at the identified BGW devices. In response to expiration of a timer, the VPNC revokes the additional transmission bandwidth allocated to the respective branch gateway device.